T
his Thursday will be remembered by many as the day Wellington’s wild weather shut the skies. Fierce winds, heavy rain, and turbulent crosswinds forced the airport into red alert. Flights were cancelled, diverted, or delayed as the capital faced yet another reminder of how unpredictable our climate has become.
Five planes had been readied in Australia for flights to Wellington that morning — two Air New Zealand and three Qantas services. Departure times were set for around 11am New Zealand time, with a flight time of about three to four hours. But as the storm warnings grew stronger, each airline faced a decision that would reveal how much it truly valued its passengers.
Air New Zealand decided to go ahead. Within 30 minutes of the scheduled times, both planes departed for Wellington. The captain on the Melbourne flight told passengers they were heading there but might need to divert to Auckland. It was an early sign of what was to follow.
Flight tracking data showed the Air New Zealand plane from Melbourne closely following a Qantas aircraft on the same route, without any sign that Wellington was a realistic first choice. In the end, both Air New Zealand flights were unable to land and diverted to Auckland. Passengers found themselves hundreds of kilometres from their destination, offered new flights from Auckland to Wellington at 5.40pm the following day. For many, that meant an unplanned overnight stay, missed connections, and plenty of stress.
Qantas, however, took a different approach. All three of its flights — from Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane — were delayed by about three hours. The airline chose to wait until the worst of the weather had passed before taking off. By the time the Qantas planes arrived in the late afternoon, the conditions had improved enough for safe landings in Wellington. Even the Brisbane flight, which briefly diverted, managed to complete its journey without major disruption.
A Wellington aviation analyst told Wellington Live, “When the destination airport is under red alert, waiting is the smarter call. It keeps passengers safe and avoids the ripple effect of missed flights and overnight delays.”
Air New Zealand’s decision raised eyebrows. Known for its world-class service and deep Kiwi loyalty, the airline found itself in a tough spotlight. Was the choice to depart based on optimism or pressure to maintain schedules?
Qantas, meanwhile, appeared to put caution and customer comfort first. Its delay decision caused some short-term frustration but ultimately ensured smoother arrivals for everyone on board.
This Thursday’s storm was a real-world test of airline judgement during extreme weather. Both airlines faced the same skies, but their responses revealed different priorities. In the end, Qantas’ patience paid off — proving that sometimes, staying on the ground a little longer is the best way to look after the people in the air.
TRUTH SEEKER
Instantly run a Quiz with friends... about the article. Interact more & analise the story. Dig in, catch out biased opinions, and "fact check" with TRUTH SEEKER by ONENETWORK WELLINGTONLIVE 👋
Do you agree with the main argument of this article?
Total votes: 22
Which airline decided to depart for Wellington despite the storm warnings?
Bias Analysis
Fact Check Summary
False, both Air New Zealand flights were unable to land and diverted to Auckland
Source: Article
True, Qantas flights were delayed but managed to land in Wellington without major disruption
Source: Article







